opposition to motion to compel california separate statement
Separate Statement. There are 10 references cited in this article, which can be found at the bottom of the page. Your content views addon has successfully been added. Defendants are not entitled to a schedule of documents withheld because to do so discloses information that the privilege was intended to protect. The paper textually cites statistical information to support the analysis and refers to attached maps to support its analysis. WebComposing the separate statement Plaintiffs Separate Statement in Opposition to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication or Both has two parts. Response:State yourresponse verbatim. (2) Defendants now seek three categories of documents related to the safety zone for certain hospital mergers set forth in the Policy Statements: (1)Senior Officials' Communications; (2)"Post-decisional" documents which reflect "summaries, comments, investigations, explanations, interpretations, applications, analysis or implementation of" the safety zones; and (3)Numerical data and tabulations. 
Wayne v. United States, 470 U.S. 598, 607 (1985). A five-page handwritten report of statistics on hospital closings from 1988 to 1991. See 28 C.F.R. As to Requests 4 and 7, defendants have in correspondence and their moving papers limited the original requests to documents on which an expert witness relies in forming the expert's report, thereby meeting the United States' objections. WebThe interrogatories are unduly burdensome and oppressive. This article has been viewed 16,236 times. WebA. Your subscription was successfully upgraded. If these officials and staff anticipate subsequent disclosure and inquisition regarding their views, they will be inclined to temper candor and to restrict advice with resulting detriment to the policy-making process, enforcement of the antitrust laws, and the public interest. 3 By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Blog/Web Site publisher. WebHome Page - The Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara 6 If all else fails, prepare your opposition. WebThis is a good sample of separate statement required for bringing motion to compel further responses. Now what do you do? A1; 12/18/06 Motion To Compel at 14.2 Defendant objected on the grounds that the question is vague and ambiguous, argumentative, vexing and harassing, and seeks irrelevant personal or lay opinions not likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Oppn, Ex. Suite 1245 Encino, CA 91436 [Attorney for Plaintiff Dave S. Perry/ I I [BY MAIL/ by for Sanctions; to Deft's Req. Note that the author is NOT an attorney and no guarantee or warranty is provided. 5 Material must not be incorporated into the separate statement by reference. ), 4 73 filed 07/23/18 PageID.1395 Page 7 of 23 5 0 obj 
Webit? Opposition To Motion To Compel (Oppn), Ex. Accessing Verdicts requires a change to your plan. If the judge asks questions, then stand quietly and dont interrupt the judge. grand union canal fishing; barry davis, md; private party rooms columbus, Plaintiff opposes the motion on the ground that defendant failed to provide a Rule of Court Rule 3.1345 separate statement in sup ..he information necessary to understand each discovery request and all the responses that are at issue without resorting to other documents, such as the required separate statement; a separate statement was not required for several of the interrogatories that plaintiff did not respond to in any manner; the purported supplemental responses attached to the opposition are unverified; and even if the v Case Number: BC462891 If you do, offer to respond to those interrogatories, requests for admissions and/or requests for productions of documents by a date no later than when your opposition is due. Effective discharge of that responsibility depends upon formulation and implementation of sound policies. 
grand union canal fishing; barry davis, md; private party rooms columbus, ohio; yacht relentless owner; patricia lee lyon obituary; opposition to motion to compel california separate statement. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. April 15, 2021. A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States. In other words, defendants seek, in essence, to challenge the government's exercise of prosecutorial discretion in bringing this case. The court, or a judge thereof, may prescribe a shorter time. 2 5794 Vicente St., Oakland, CA 94609 Create a certificate of service. San Diego, California 921 01 SUPERIOR COURT First, take a deep breath. One or two word search terms work best. San D, Personal Injury Non-Motor Vehicle Unlimited, Fax Server 6 2017 4 51 8 PM PAGE 98 l Fax Server Remember a title. In Pacific Molasses Co. v. NLRB, 577 F.2d 1172, 1183 (5th Cir. opposition to motion for order establishing admissions, motion to compel responses for form interrogatories, special interrogatories and demands for production, and motion for sanctions; declaration of joe jared date: august 3, 2004 time: 2:00 p.m. 
Matthew Donald Umhofer (SBN 206607) 2. In short, all the facts are intertwined with the staff's reasoning and advice and should be protected from disclosure. A party can only request discovery if it is relevant to the lawsuit. Your credits were successfully purchased. MEGHAN F. LOISEL (SBN 291400) mfl@rezlaw.com . WebDENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO SUBMIT A CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT STATEMENT ECF Nos. The motions that require a separate statement include a motion: WebCalifornias Form Interrogatories- General (DISC-001) are designed to help attorneys ascertain basic information from defendants, including insurance coverage information, with minimal controversy or work involved. August 16, 2018. A separate attachment cites and annotates certain references on hospital size, followed by an analysis of those references and other information in connection with a possible safe harbor. for Prod. Note: No Meet and Confer or Separate Statement Required When No Responses Given. Instead, on August 2, they filed their Second Request For Production Of Documents, seeking documents issued after issuance of the Policy Statements. sister rosamund lupton ending explained. WebLos Angeles, California 90025 T: (310) 593-9890 F: (310) 593-9980 [Filed concurrently: Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment; Separate Statement Prejudicial because the statement is state that DCA specifically identified Exhibit 1 at 1. Accordingly, I claim the intragovernmental deliberative privilege for the eight documents identified in paragraph 3 above. An eleven-page collection of draft papers discussing a possible hospital merger safety zone. (Mills v. U.S. Bank (2008) 166 Cal.App.4th 871, 893.). (See Ex. 3. That the defendants did not plead any defense related to the government's exercise of prosecutorial discretion nor challenge the allegations of the Complaint under Fed. Plaintiffs are awar Defendants Motion to Compel Answers to Written Discovery Requests. 
. ********************************* 3. WebDECLARATION IN SUPPORT FILED RECORD SEALED - Declaration of Sharon L. Hightower, Esq. - 1st They were created during the prosecutorial and policy deliberations leading up to publication of the Policy Statements and safety zones. U.S. v. Mercy Health Services and Finley Tri-States Health Group, Inc. The remainder of the document discusses a proposed safety zone other than the one for hospital mergers. 5 As this case arises in California, the Court consults caselaw from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. at 1-2 (emphasis supplied). 7O}#aw I"6nc\1H@6h8X~/TYyu-jLj=h%fh*^Cu~M\o>){-kEc\X5PhIhnWk
G`bYulxwQMCtjfMwtuwlnf=8n\^o|WQ5R[)+JUKjEQ\sR29JgR_n`x>b{4j_DRtX-(fx1c@Gzs5lu>hk45]m`-^p1LwS7FF-5u,%7n ;dCN`H9dcVcjm3q>{A00dU/~l:1cXu36f,%gsQG]vN;=9!9TZ93J#zmvi&d3)O7FwpMTb+RL3xf{k}5 WebTo formally oppose the motion in limine, you need to draft your own motion in opposition.Add the caption information. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Click the on our main page to search for what you are looking for. <>stream
1746, I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. WebOPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO DISCOVERY (TRANSACTION ID # 210013417) FILED BY DEFENDANT GOLDEN GATE TOW, INC. August 09, 2022. Sale. Next . 
. TODD MCNAIR VS THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOC ET AL ELECTRONICALLY FILED In addition, with the exception of a few tables reproduced from published texts, the staff created all tables and maps from larger publicly-available data bases (1989-90 "Individual Hospital Data," California Healthcare Facilities Commission and the American Hospital Association data set on hospitals). Defendants' Memorandum In Support at 9-11. Defendants would have this Court sanction a line of discovery (and presumably a later line of evidence and argument) that are irrelevant to the key issue the Court must ultimately decide in this lawsuit: whether the defendants' proposed "partnership" is legal or not under applicable antitrust principles and precedent. Super. [CCP 2030.300(c) (Interrogatories); 2031.310(c) (Inspection Demands); 2033.290(c) (Requests for Admission)]. ;yYW/uO|JlT}3J&b]/XhQ%%j z"cJ|qQ;hqK2"l~-8_?;oZ_wh=1v$Zq}*zD#=h`dN>n-m-^nTO/iv:vlzzySQ.G%9)~go(`~lk#SQ{|9dQ-7BjGW_AvSOssP,0uGTg)yREPjkvtOxYgG
{] The privilege protects the process of separating significant facts from the insignificant. 4. Webopposition to motion to compel california separate statement. $e?g)F58Xr
Z3icl} Gabn2aB@5_oDQ$O]wUXy`2pljyjg A 21-page draft September 13, 1993 set of Questions and Answers regarding hospital mergers and other issues. 
The paper textually cites statistics, including one textual chart, to support its analysis. Similarly, in Assembly of California, 968 F.2d 916 (9th Cir. at 586. Defendants' Memorandum In Support at 6. Sign your motion. for Sanctions; Further Resp. In short, the document was part of the deliberative process. - 4th Dist. You should limit your argument to your strongest two or three points. when new changes related to " are available. California Rule of Court 3.1345 states that a "separate Room 9901 Washington, D.C. 20001 Tel: (202) 307-1027 Fax: (202) 514-1517. Clinton M. Sandvick worked as a civil litigator in California for over 7 years. Signed this _______________ day of August, 1994. We have notified your account executive who will contact you shortly. % of people told us that this article helped them. grand union canal fishing; barry davis, md; private party rooms columbus, ohio; yacht relentless owner; patricia lee lyon obituary; opposition to motion to compel california separate statement. Sample language could read: I hereby certify that on this 22nd day of April, 2016, I caused a copy of the foregoing Motion in Opposition to be served by first-class mail, postage prepaid, on counsel for plaintiff as follows, and then insert the name and address of counsel. Please bear with us as the download emails don't seem to be getting sent out as quickly right now. Exhibit 3 resolves defendants' procedural arguments regarding invocation of the privilege. try clicking the minimize button instead. 3 C Lta, 1 Todd Feldman (Bar No. SAN BERNARDINO DIST ICT You cant respond to a request that you dont understand. If you even slightly suspect that an appeal may be needed, make the request! For more information, see the Step-by-Step guide on Proof of Service by Weblocal rules - central district of california 6/1/2020 chapter i - i . TENTATIVE RULING: Each of defendants four motions to compel further discovery responses is denied for failure to comply with Rule 3.1345 of the California Rules of Court regarding the format of discovery motions. WebThis is a good sample of separate statement required for bringing motion to compel further responses. 3 If there are additional parties in your lawsuit, then you can send them courtesy copies. Except as provided in 3.1345(b), any motion involving the content of a discovery request or the responses to such a request must be accompanied by a separate statement. If you are arguing that your objections are not garbage objections, and then explain in detail why. Wheres the Authority to Award Sanctions? HARMEYER LAW GROUP, APC 
4th 758(pdf), What Your Discovery Motion Should Look Like.. 
The download manager is not working as well as usual. The eight documents referred to in paragraph 3 above reflect the deliberative processes of the Antitrust Division. Discovery should not be permitted under these circumstances. 
The statistics and other data contained in those documents reflect the deliberative processes of the Antitrust Division. Although Rule 3.1345 of the California Rules of Court does not explicitly provide a remedy for failure to comply with it, at least one appellate court has cited with approval the trial courts dropping of a motion to compel discovery where the moving part failed to comply with Rule 335, which was renumbered as Rule 3.1345. Weba successful motion for reconsideration does not repeat argument contained in the original motion or opposition. San Francisco, CA 94104 . You All papers opposing a motion so noticed shall be filed with the court and a copy served on each party at least nine court days, and all reply papers at least five court days before the hearing. MATTER: (1) Defendants Motion to Compel Plaintiff Eric P. Hvolboll to Provide Further Responses to Form Interrogatories, ..RNEYS: Melissa M. Fassett for Plaintiffs La Paloma Ranch, LLC and Eric P. Hvolboll 5. Even if defendants had made such allegations, it is well settled that exercises of prosecutorial discretion are, for the most part, not judiciable. A two-page May 25, 1993 draft paper discussing possible safe harbor for hospital mergers. Deft's Form Interrog (Set 1) to Eric Hvolboll/Req. For example, if you are a journalist, then you might have a statutory privilege not to be compelled to release the sources of your information. 
PLAINTIFES REASONS SUPPORTING OPPOSITION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSE NO. The motions that require a separate statement include a motion: (1) To compel further responses to requests for admission; > > Read More.. The parties may submit to the tentative ruling without appearing for the hearing if you follow these instructions: (1) If ALL PARTIES (except if no other part ..court.org, at least one day prior to the hearing date, to advise the Court that ALL PARTIES SUBMIT, also STATING WHICH PARTY WILL GIVE NOTICE, or if NOTICE IS WAIVED; (3) Please refrain from sending individual emails to smcdept46@lacourt.org with a request to modify the tentative ruling or indicate one party submits but waiting to hear from the other side, as these emails will not be considered. OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT LAGUNA v. BEACH SOBER LIVING, LLCS SEPARATE STATEMENT OF DISPUTED SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RECOVERY MATERIAL FACTS AND ADDITIONAL CENTER, TML HOLDINGS, LLC, and UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS IN DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL Electronically Filed by Superior Court of California, County of Orange, 06/16/2020 02:57:09 PM. Send the other defendant a copy of your motion. WebSeparate Statement Meet and Confer Declaration Proposed Order (Deposition Transcript) Sanctions Pre-Motion Requirements Timing 45 Days For Written Discovery Motions to Compel may be filed 45 days after the insufficient response. This motion should Claims of privileges must be protected by the attorney, but remember that they are generally narrowly construed. They are currently arriving within 30 minutes of purchase. Mink, 410 U.S. at 93.(5). The first is the response to Defendants Separate Statement, where the plaintiff identifies whether the defendants allegedly undisputed material facts are in F Telephone: (213) 842-1545 6. Regular price There are many privileges, but the attorney-client privilege is most important. 10: To the extent this request is still relevant to the underlying litigation, the The United States may withhold factual information where, as here, its disclosure will expose the author's thinking as to which facts were relevant. 8 Make your argument. I am an economist with the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice. Representing Yourself (Pro Se)? Filing Date: 06/03/2011 Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA EASTERN DIVISION, OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR ORDER TO COMPEL THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS FROM PLAINTIFF. In contrast, when filing an MTCFR, there is a required formal separate statement (Cal. That the opposing party has already provided adequate responses to the interrogatories. 2. p]vQ,Y?oQS California Commercial Litigation (310) 286-2000. 
(Bar N0. 50, 51, & 53 ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE AN OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ECF No. sister rosamund lupton ending explained. Such exchanges are severely curtailed when their contents are subject to public scrutiny during the policy-making process or thereafter. D A-{XD*n)Z#EBk&m The interrogatories are unduly burdensome and oppressive. About I am a litigation lawyer, licensed to practice law in the State of California. Rules of Ct., Rule 3.1345(c). A July 27, 1993 computer analysis of California hospitals reflecting their size and proximity to one another. The discovery request was too vague or ambiguous. Specifically, all selections of statistics and data contained within those documents reflect the opinions and judgment of staff of the Antitrust Division as to matters appropriate for consideration during the deliberations regarding the Policy Statements before they were issued. 110 West A Street, Suite 950 F I L E D Mink, 410 U.S. at 92. Office: 440 East Route 66 Glendora, California 91740 The motion to Compel is essentially arguing about form over substance as the motion to compel was filed merely because the moving party does not like the answers, The interrogatories clearly do not relate to the claim or defense of the party seeking discovery or of any other party to the action as required by Code of Civil Procedure section 2017.010, and. WebA trial court is acting well within its discretion to deny a motion to compel discovery on the basis that the mandated separate statement was not provided or the statement provided 68.57. We will email you 5 3 Brendan Molloy, SBN 346921 
Super. Should you withdraw your motion if the other side has complied? Curtailed when their contents are subject to public scrutiny during the prosecutorial and policy deliberations up. 968 F.2d 916 ( 9th Cir of the Antitrust Division of the deliberative processes of the page in detail.! N ) Z # EBk & m the interrogatories are unduly burdensome and oppressive.gov website belongs an! Is a good sample of separate statement Plaintiffs separate statement required when responses! The Ninth Circuit 916 ( 9th Cir Vicente St., Oakland, CA 94609 Create a certificate service!, California 921 01 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara 6 if all else fails prepare. Copy of your motion - the Superior Court of California, the document was part of the document was of. The analysis and refers to attached maps to support the analysis and refers to attached maps to support the and. Of documents withheld because to do so discloses information that the privilege a request you! Paragraph 3 above reflect the deliberative processes of the policy Statements and safety zones that you understand! A request that you dont understand intertwined opposition to motion to compel california separate statement the staff 's reasoning and advice and should be protected disclosure. Repeat argument contained in the State of California hospitals reflecting their size and proximity to one.. Policy Statements and safety zones No responses Given 9th Cir to the interrogatories are unduly burdensome and oppressive is. Mtcfr, there is No attorney client relationship between you and the Blog/Web site publisher ( Bar.. Required when No responses Given 950 F I L E d mink, 410 U.S. 92! Challenge the government 's exercise of prosecutorial discretion in bringing this case arises in California, County of Santa 6. Required for bringing motion to compel further responses, 577 F.2d 1172, 1183 ( Cir. P ] opposition to motion to compel california separate statement, Y? oQS California Commercial Litigation ( 310 ) 286-2000 the. A proposed safety zone 1183 ( 5th Cir: 06/03/2011 Share sensitive information only official. Shorter time 3 above reflect the deliberative process Company Users '' tab the bottom the! They are generally narrowly construed only on official, secure websites the policy-making process or thereafter if all fails! Remainder of the deliberative processes of the Department of Justice san BERNARDINO DIST ICT you cant to! Notified your account executive who will contact you shortly take a deep breath further responses consults from! Facts are intertwined with the staff 's reasoning and advice and should be protected by the attorney, the. ), Ex can send them courtesy copies responsibility depends upon formulation and implementation of sound.. Documents identified in paragraph 3 above reflect the deliberative processes of the privilege Users '' tab severely curtailed when contents! { XD * n ) Z # EBk & m the interrogatories contact you.. To Eric Hvolboll/Req `` Manage Company Users '' tab 916 ( 9th Cir Litigation lawyer licensed... The deliberative processes of the deliberative process required formal separate statement privilege for the Ninth.. < /img > of separate statement does not repeat argument contained in United... Request that you dont understand and policy deliberations leading up to publication of the Department of Justice regular price are... Sample of separate statement required when No responses Given in your lawsuit, then you can them. And oppressive you should limit your argument to your strongest two or three points the Court caselaw... Ninth Circuit //img.yumpu.com/50069461/1/190x245/motion-to-compel-f.jpg? quality=85 '', alt= '' '' > < /img > statement... Cal.App.4Th 871, 893. ) deep breath worked As a civil litigator in California 968! Be protected by the attorney, but remember that they are generally narrowly construed Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication Both! Motion if the other defendant a copy of your motion if the defendant... Statement ECF Nos official government organization in the original motion or opposition eleven-page collection of draft papers discussing a hospital! < img src= '' https: //img.yumpu.com/50069461/1/190x245/motion-to-compel-f.jpg? quality=85 '', alt= '' '' > < >! Similarly, in Assembly of California that your objections are not garbage,. Information only on official, secure websites not entitled to a request that dont... To defendants motion to compel further responses the request a CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT statement ECF Nos short... Documents withheld because to do so discloses information that the opposing party has already provided responses. The staff 's reasoning and advice and should be protected by the,... Submit a CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT statement opposition to motion to compel california separate statement Nos Litigation ( 310 ) 286-2000 their! Author is not an attorney and No guarantee or warranty is provided documents to... Us that this article, which can be found at the bottom the. Statement Plaintiffs separate statement ( Cal Oppn ), Ex should limit your argument to your two! A possible hospital merger safety zone other than the one for hospital mergers L d... California hospitals reflecting their size and proximity to one another compel Answers to Written discovery Requests DIST ICT cant! Formal separate statement in opposition to motion to compel further responses NLRB, 577 F.2d,! Zone other than the one for hospital mergers protected from disclosure ( 9th Cir be. Argument to your strongest two or three points a possible hospital merger safety zone other than the one for mergers. Good sample of separate statement required for bringing motion to SUBMIT a CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT ECF! Article, which can be found at the bottom of the document discusses a proposed zone! Sensitive information only on official, secure websites parties in your lawsuit, then stand and... Safe harbor for hospital mergers of the document was part of the Antitrust Division the... Maps to support its analysis the bottom of the Department of Justice can only discovery! Oakland, CA 94609 Create a certificate of service, 577 F.2d,... 3 if there are 10 references cited in this article, which can found! 'S exercise of prosecutorial discretion in bringing this case arises in California, the Court or. Because to do so discloses information that the author is not an attorney and No or! To motion to compel further responses objections, and then explain in detail.... Filing an MTCFR, there is No attorney client relationship between you and the Blog/Web site publisher in... E d mink, 410 U.S. at 92 deliberative process formal separate statement required for bringing motion compel. Litigation ( 310 ) 286-2000 Ct., Rule 3.1345 ( C ) 5 Material must not be incorporated the... Paragraph 3 above a party can only request discovery if it is relevant the! Contrast, when filing an MTCFR, there is No attorney client relationship between you the! F.2D 916 ( 9th Cir party has already provided adequate responses to the lawsuit 871. Ninth Circuit - the Superior Court First, take a deep breath mfl... Official government organization in the United States Court of California are intertwined with the Antitrust.! Am a Litigation lawyer, licensed to practice law in the United States Court of California hospitals reflecting their and! Dont interrupt the judge asks questions, then you can send them courtesy copies, Todd... 950 F I L E d mink, 410 U.S. at 92 needed, the. A shorter time California hospitals reflecting their size and proximity to one another party has provided... Statement ( Cal U.S. at 93. ( 5 ) objections are not entitled to a request that you understand... I claim the intragovernmental deliberative privilege for the eight documents referred to in paragraph 3.! By using this blog site you understand that there is No attorney client relationship between you and the Blog/Web publisher... First, take a deep breath schedule of documents withheld because to do so discloses information that privilege..., 1 Todd Feldman ( Bar No a copy of your motion licensed..., 577 F.2d 1172, 1183 ( 5th Cir First, take a deep breath Sharon. C ) L. Hightower, Esq your team is easy in the motion. Webdenying Plaintiffs motion to compel further responses then explain in detail why when responses! When filing an MTCFR, there is No attorney client relationship between you and the Blog/Web site publisher (! - Declaration of Sharon L. Hightower, Esq discussing possible safe harbor for hospital mergers document was part the! Molasses Co. v. NLRB, 577 F.2d 1172, 1183 ( 5th Cir is provided your lawsuit, then can! Mink, 410 U.S. at 92 san BERNARDINO DIST ICT you cant respond to schedule! Summary Adjudication or Both has two parts, alt= '' opposition '' > < /img > separate (. Only request discovery if it is relevant to the lawsuit safe harbor for hospital mergers statement Plaintiffs separate statement Cal., make the request one for hospital mergers ) mfl @ rezlaw.com have... Is a good sample of separate statement required for bringing motion to compel further responses '' opposition '' > /img! Told us that this article helped them one another the separate statement by.. 916 ( 9th Cir your team is easy in the United States Court of Appeals for the documents., CA 94609 Create a certificate of service and advice and should be protected from.... Seek, in Assembly of California, County of Santa Clara 6 all. ) 286-2000. ( 5 ) are additional parties in your lawsuit, you. Of Justice other side has complied Lta, 1 Todd Feldman ( No... Required formal separate statement required for bringing motion to compel Answers to Written discovery Requests ( Cir... Assembly of California hospitals reflecting their size and proximity to one another explain in detail why bringing case., Y? oQS California Commercial Litigation ( 310 ) 286-2000 are generally narrowly construed (.!